Update PERFORMANCE section with numbers building libX11 and all

its dependencies in pkgfs vs pkgsrc. You know, pkgsrc is 40% slower.

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : 6fe7cc35419d7d936cc4a996c481a7b5da57cf44
This commit is contained in:
Juan RP 2008-10-04 15:09:11 +02:00
parent 7029fec44d
commit b4b9a41fac

15
README
View file

@ -90,17 +90,18 @@ That's all for now folks. I hope you find it useful, as I do.
pkgfs is really fast, trust me. That was one of my reasons to make my own pkgfs is really fast, trust me. That was one of my reasons to make my own
pkgsrc/ports alike system. pkgsrc/ports alike system.
If you want benchmarks, here is one; building libX11 (all deps installed) If you want benchmarks, here is one: building libX11 and all its dependencies
with pkgfs: required (not included building xstow) with pkgfs:
217.00s real 103.23s user 29.96s system 251.20s real 121.36s user 53.94s system
versus pkgsrc (make install clean): versus pkgsrc (make install clean clean-depends and digest previously
installed):
229.22s real 112.75s user 54.79s system 450.41s real 167.58s user 97.31s system
The difference in this package might not be too big as I might think... but That's more or less 40% faster! that's the price you pay for having those
anyway, 12 seconds faster is not that bad. wrappers in pkgsrc that aren't very useful on NetBSD :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW TO MAKE TEMPLATES HOW TO MAKE TEMPLATES