From b4b9a41fac61926dd0e53983a4787ed261455f62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juan RP Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:09:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update PERFORMANCE section with numbers building libX11 and all its dependencies in pkgfs vs pkgsrc. You know, pkgsrc is 40% slower. --HG-- extra : convert_revision : 6fe7cc35419d7d936cc4a996c481a7b5da57cf44 --- README | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index c5fff76ab1..4e4f7ab04e 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -90,17 +90,18 @@ That's all for now folks. I hope you find it useful, as I do. pkgfs is really fast, trust me. That was one of my reasons to make my own pkgsrc/ports alike system. -If you want benchmarks, here is one; building libX11 (all deps installed) -with pkgfs: +If you want benchmarks, here is one: building libX11 and all its dependencies +required (not included building xstow) with pkgfs: - 217.00s real 103.23s user 29.96s system + 251.20s real 121.36s user 53.94s system -versus pkgsrc (make install clean): +versus pkgsrc (make install clean clean-depends and digest previously +installed): - 229.22s real 112.75s user 54.79s system + 450.41s real 167.58s user 97.31s system -The difference in this package might not be too big as I might think... but -anyway, 12 seconds faster is not that bad. +That's more or less 40% faster! that's the price you pay for having those +wrappers in pkgsrc that aren't very useful on NetBSD :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HOW TO MAKE TEMPLATES