void-packages/srcpkgs/libreoffice/patches/0003-configure_ac-libc-version.patch
Đoàn Trần Công Danh 861ac185a6 srcpkgs/l*: convert patches to -Np1
```sh
git grep -l '^patch_args=-Np0' "srcpkgs/$1*/template" |
while read template; do
	for p in ${template%/template}/patches/*; do
		sed -i '
			\,^[+-][+-][+-] /dev/null,b
			/^[*-]\+ [0-9]\+\(,[0-9]\+\)\? [*-]\+$/b
			s,^[*][*][*] ,&a/,
			/^--- /{
				s,\(^--- \)\(./\)*,\1a/,
				s,[.][Oo][Rr][Ii][Gg]\([	/]\),\1,
				s/[.][Oo][Rr][Ii][Gg]$//
				s/[.]patched[.]\([^.]\)/.\1/
				h
			}
			/^+++ -/{
				g
				s/^--- a/+++ b/
				b
			}
			s,\(^+++ \)\(./\)*,\1b/,
		' "$p"
	done
	sed -i '/^patch_args=/d' $template
done
```
2021-06-20 13:17:29 +07:00

27 lines
882 B
Diff

Source: @pullmoll
Upstream: no
Reason: This test fails for Musl libc and we know we have a working libc
--- a/configure.ac 2020-01-23 00:14:16.000000000 +0100
+++ b/configure.ac 2020-01-30 00:23:00.859196125 +0100
@@ -10233,18 +10233,10 @@
AC_SUBST(LIBNUMBERTEXT_CFLAGS)
dnl ***************************************
-dnl testing libc version for Linux...
+dnl Always assume we have a working libc
dnl ***************************************
if test "$_os" = "Linux"; then
- AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether libc is >= 2.1.1])
- exec 6>/dev/null # no output
- AC_CHECK_LIB(c, gnu_get_libc_version, HAVE_LIBC=yes; export HAVE_LIBC)
- exec 6>&1 # output on again
- if test "$HAVE_LIBC"; then
- AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
- else
- AC_MSG_ERROR([no, upgrade libc])
- fi
+ HAVE_LIBC=yes; export HAVE_LIBC
fi
dnl =========================================