19f9f40685
This is a fully CK patched kernel.
53 lines
1.7 KiB
Diff
53 lines
1.7 KiB
Diff
Make 250HZ not be the default to discourage desktop users from choosing this
|
|
option since 1000 will provide better latencies with only miniscule amounts
|
|
of extra overhead and power consumption.
|
|
|
|
-ck
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
kernel/Kconfig.hz | 17 ++++++++++-------
|
|
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
Index: linux-3.16-ck1/kernel/Kconfig.hz
|
|
===================================================================
|
|
--- linux-3.16-ck1.orig/kernel/Kconfig.hz 2014-08-16 14:46:12.299916810 +1000
|
|
+++ linux-3.16-ck1/kernel/Kconfig.hz 2014-08-16 14:46:12.298916810 +1000
|
|
@@ -23,13 +23,14 @@ choice
|
|
with lots of processors that may show reduced performance if
|
|
too many timer interrupts are occurring.
|
|
|
|
- config HZ_250
|
|
+ config HZ_250_NODEFAULT
|
|
bool "250 HZ"
|
|
help
|
|
- 250 Hz is a good compromise choice allowing server performance
|
|
- while also showing good interactive responsiveness even
|
|
- on SMP and NUMA systems. If you are going to be using NTSC video
|
|
- or multimedia, selected 300Hz instead.
|
|
+ 250 HZ is a lousy compromise choice allowing server interactivity
|
|
+ while also showing desktop throughput and no extra power saving on
|
|
+ laptops. No good for anything.
|
|
+
|
|
+ Recommend 100 or 1000 instead.
|
|
|
|
config HZ_300
|
|
bool "300 HZ"
|
|
@@ -43,14 +44,16 @@ choice
|
|
bool "1000 HZ"
|
|
help
|
|
1000 Hz is the preferred choice for desktop systems and other
|
|
- systems requiring fast interactive responses to events.
|
|
+ systems requiring fast interactive responses to events. Laptops
|
|
+ can also benefit from this choice without sacrificing battery life
|
|
+ if dynticks is also enabled.
|
|
|
|
endchoice
|
|
|
|
config HZ
|
|
int
|
|
default 100 if HZ_100
|
|
- default 250 if HZ_250
|
|
+ default 250 if HZ_250_NODEFAULT
|
|
default 300 if HZ_300
|
|
default 1000 if HZ_1000
|
|
|