void-packages/srcpkgs/glibc/patches/glibc-upstream-08.patch
2017-10-10 15:39:48 +00:00

76 lines
2.7 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

From 2aa1a7a8f8b9b7879bc6eb1c34d1580f992c406d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:48:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 08] assert: Suppress pedantic warning caused by statement
expression [BZ #21242]
(cherry picked from commit 8b2c63e4e2ad1fd161f80004ed30624f2a37b57b)
---
ChangeLog | 7 +++++++
NEWS | 1 +
assert/assert.h | 12 +++++++++---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 5ea9b8baa7..0057c0902a 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2017-08-11 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
+
+ [BZ #21242]
+ * assert/assert.h [__GNUC__ && !__STRICT_ANSI__] (assert):
+ Suppress pedantic warning resulting from statement expression.
+ (__ASSERT_FUNCTION): Add missing __extension__.
+
2017-08-10 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
* malloc/malloc.c (get_max_fast): Reimplement as an inline
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index ec6cf34122..d57c4052cf 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Version 2.26.1
The following bugs are resolved with this release:
+ [21242] assert: Suppress pedantic warning caused by statement expression
[21885] getaddrinfo: Release resolver context on error in gethosts
[21932] Unpaired __resolv_context_get in generic get*_r implementation
diff --git a/assert/assert.h b/assert/assert.h
index 22f019537c..6801cfeb10 100644
--- a/assert/assert.h
+++ b/assert/assert.h
@@ -91,13 +91,19 @@ __END_DECLS
? __ASSERT_VOID_CAST (0) \
: __assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION))
# else
+/* The first occurrence of EXPR is not evaluated due to the sizeof,
+ but will trigger any pedantic warnings masked by the __extension__
+ for the second occurrence. The explicit comparison against zero is
+ required to support function pointers and bit fields in this
+ context, and to suppress the evaluation of variable length
+ arrays. */
# define assert(expr) \
- ({ \
+ ((void) sizeof ((expr) == 0), __extension__ ({ \
if (expr) \
; /* empty */ \
else \
__assert_fail (#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ASSERT_FUNCTION); \
- })
+ }))
# endif
# ifdef __USE_GNU
@@ -113,7 +119,7 @@ __END_DECLS
C9x has a similar variable called __func__, but prefer the GCC one since
it demangles C++ function names. */
# if defined __cplusplus ? __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 6) : __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 4)
-# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
+# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __extension__ __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
# else
# if defined __STDC_VERSION__ && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L
# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION __func__