From 3a0bdd2f1e4c9ec473ffe1d32f5d13f1f6aa776a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ojab <ojab@ojab.ru>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 11:24:33 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] acct: fix build, add homepage & license

---
 srcpkgs/acct/patches/acct-6.5.5-no-gets.patch | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
 srcpkgs/acct/template                         |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 srcpkgs/acct/patches/acct-6.5.5-no-gets.patch

diff --git a/srcpkgs/acct/patches/acct-6.5.5-no-gets.patch b/srcpkgs/acct/patches/acct-6.5.5-no-gets.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..728d44f77a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/srcpkgs/acct/patches/acct-6.5.5-no-gets.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+hack until acct pulls a newer gnulib version
+
+From 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
+Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:30:41 -0600
+Subject: [PATCH] stdio: don't assume gets any more
+
+Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11
+and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning
+any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous
+interface.
+
+--- lib/stdio.in.h
++++ lib/stdio.in.h
+@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@
+    so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning.  Assume it is
+    always declared, since it is required by C89.  */
+ #undef gets
+-_GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
+ 
+ #if @GNULIB_FOPEN@
+ # if @REPLACE_FOPEN@
diff --git a/srcpkgs/acct/template b/srcpkgs/acct/template
index 5b93813bc6..ef2cdf2219 100644
--- a/srcpkgs/acct/template
+++ b/srcpkgs/acct/template
@@ -3,8 +3,10 @@ pkgname=acct
 version=6.5.5
 distfiles="http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/acct/acct-$version.tar.gz"
 build_style=gnu-configure
-revision=1
+revision=2
 short_desc="GNU Accounting Utilities"
+homepage="https://www.gnu.org/software/acct/"
+license="GPL-3"
 maintainer="Juan RP <xtraeme@gmail.com>"
 checksum=4163c87b9e92a73a65eaeadc6c41caa4626da782ff26d6e7a945edcc140a6fd5
 long_desc="